Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED IZMIR

IMO: 9143879
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,386 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 29.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: OKEE LILO, MSC LILO F

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,386 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.7

Container median 177 kg/nm (−63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+137%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,617 t

CO₂ emitted

5,121 t

5,200 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,637 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,263 h

94 days, 26% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−63%)

78.8Ranks 71 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 13.3 (−18%)

9.1Faster than 21% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+137%)

7.22Ranks 1,855 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU41%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU7%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,316 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

334 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+79 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED IZMIR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED IZMIR
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED IZMIR
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	−5%	+25%	+9%	−1%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−6%	−12%	+46%	−24%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−14%	−25%	−52%	−22%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+11%	+24%	+91%	+7%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+5%	−1%	−49%	+6%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−7%	−10%	+70%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+4.7 kn	−25%	+42%	+110%	−39%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,617	5,121	24,637	2,263	10.9	65.7	38.6	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,577	4,971	22,680	2,738	8.3	69.5	39.0	–
2023	not published	1,147	3,628	15,527	1,766	8.8	73.9	51.2	–
2022	not published	2,786	8,736	32,555	3,222	10.1	85.6	65.9	–
2021	not published	1,319	4,120	17,086	1,886	9.1	77.2	61.8	–
2020	not published	2,439	7,627	33,334	3,454	9.7	73.2	58.3	–
2019	not published	1,547	4,844	19,617	1,977	9.9	78.9	61.2	–
2018	not published	984	3,072	9,346	1,791	5.2	105	101	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	38.6	16.3	+137%	1,855 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	39.0	17.5	+123%	1,609 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	51.2	19.4	+164%	1,694 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	65.9	19.1	+245%	1,750 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	61.8	17.9	+245%	1,690 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	58.3	17.6	+231%	1,673 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	61.2	18.9	+224%	1,666 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	101	20.2	+399%	1,690 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.