Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED CERKEZKOY

IMO: 9147215
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,204 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.95 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,204 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

76.3

Container median 177 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+79%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−32%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

915 t

CO₂ emitted

2,876 t

2,921 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,996 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,324 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−57%)

78.8Ranks 185 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 13.3 (−32%)

9.1Faster than 10% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+79%)

7.22Ranks 1,671 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU44%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

63% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,800 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

121 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+45 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED CERKEZKOY
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED CERKEZKOY
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED CERKEZKOY
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−20%	−18%	−14%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+29%	+54%	+8%	+6%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+2%	−14%	−14%	+31%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	+4%	−11%	+127%	−18%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−7%	+3%	−19%	−15%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+4%	−2%	+27%	−4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	−5%	+28%	−56%	−55%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	915	2,876	11,996	1,324	9.1	76.3	29.2	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,327	4,181	13,890	1,577	8.8	95.6	35.7	–
2023	not published	954	3,015	12,892	1,751	7.4	74.0	33.7	–
2022	not published	1,087	3,415	14,970	1,719	8.7	72.6	25.8	–
2021	not published	459	1,441	6,585	645	10.2	69.7	31.3	–
2020	not published	612	1,933	8,165	887	9.2	74.9	36.8	–
2019	not published	466	1,453	6,442	658	9.8	72.3	38.4	–
2018	not published	1,128	3,515	14,807	2,029	7.3	76.2	84.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	29.2	16.3	+79%	1,671 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	35.7	17.5	+104%	1,556 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	33.7	19.4	+74%	1,430 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	25.8	19.1	+35%	1,170 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	31.3	17.9	+75%	1,336 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	36.8	17.6	+109%	1,432 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	38.4	18.9	+103%	1,393 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	84.9	20.2	+320%	1,661 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.