Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED URLA

IMO: 9160920
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,109 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FAS DAMMAM, MSC MARITINA F

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,109 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.1

Container median 177 kg/nm (−63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

40.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+150%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,495 t

CO₂ emitted

4,776 t

4,849 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,949 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,168 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−63%)

78.8Ranks 66 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 18% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 40.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+150%)

7.22Ranks 1,888 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU36%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

67% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,177 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

201 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+73 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED URLA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED URLA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MED URLA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.4 kn	−18%	+21%	+113%	−14%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	+14%	−22%	+4%	+2%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−27%	−19%	−61%	−36%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−1%	−12%	+32%	+2%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+7%	+7%	+38%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	−1%	+48%	−26%	−9%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+1%	+3%	−40%	+197%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,495	4,776	22,949	2,168	10.6	65.1	40.7	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	850	2,659	10,757	1,490	7.2	79.0	47.3	–
2023	not published	721	2,261	10,383	991	10.5	69.4	46.6	–
2022	not published	2,491	7,860	26,338	2,772	9.5	94.6	–	–
2021	not published	1,910	6,029	19,948	1,869	10.7	95.7	–	–
2020	not published	1,286	4,058	14,425	1,341	10.8	89.1	–	–
2019	not published	1,763	5,507	19,590	2,736	7.2	90.0	–	–
2018	not published	2,914	9,097	32,644	4,676	7.0	89.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	40.7	16.3	+150%	1,888 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	47.3	17.5	+170%	1,721 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	46.6	19.4	+140%	1,639 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	72.2	21.6	+235%	994 of 1,034	DNV	C
2021	not published	70.9	22.7	+212%	1,110 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	67.8	24.5	+177%	1,110 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	74.5	25.0	+198%	1,094 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	25.1	24.9	+1%	529 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.