Navalyze · Container · Ship

X-PRESS MULHACEN

IMO: 9365960
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,287 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 31.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,287 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

79.7

Container median 177 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+187%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,775 t

CO₂ emitted

11,719 t

11,904 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

47,363 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,167 h

174 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 236 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+187%)

7.22Ranks 1,985 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU7%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU4%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,828 t).

Fuel burned laden

3,447 t

91% of all fuel; 9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

396 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+185 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

X-PRESS MULHACEN
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

X-PRESS MULHACEN
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

X-PRESS MULHACEN
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	−11%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+10%	+19%	+2%	+32%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+6%	−5%	−8%	−15%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−5%	−1%	+4%	+11%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	−5%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−2%	+5%	−22%	−21%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+21%	+3%	−3%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	3,775	11,719	47,363	4,167	11.4	79.7	46.8	91%
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	4,268	13,389	53,134	4,606	11.5	80.3	59.2	84%
2023	not published	3,793	11,962	51,895	4,876	10.6	73.1	45.0	–
2022	not published	3,890	12,444	56,296	4,745	11.9	69.1	53.1	–
2021	not published	3,934	12,491	54,356	4,773	11.4	72.4	47.9	–
2020	not published	4,104	12,840	57,464	5,030	11.4	71.4	69.3	–
2019	not published	5,351	16,782	73,851	6,868	10.8	72.5	87.8	–
2018	not published	4,551	14,348	75,899	6,029	12.6	60.0	39,855,404	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	46.8	16.3	+187%	1,985 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	59.2	17.5	+238%	1,848 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	45.0	19.4	+132%	1,618 of 1,899	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	53.1	19.1	+178%	1,650 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	47.9	17.9	+168%	1,573 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	69.3	17.6	+294%	1,743 of 1,797	Korean Register	A
2019	not published	87.8	18.9	+365%	1,765 of 1,788	Korean Register	A+C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.