Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 17 |
| CO₂ emitted | 198,729 t+15.0% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 99.1 |
| Average speed | 11.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 2 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.23.7 (+45% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin container | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs container medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD. | 17 | 23.7 | +45% | 99.1 | 11.0 | 3,553 | 4.0% | 0 / 2 |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD. | ABS (17) | 76% | 0% | 12% | 0% |
Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA BARU | 9295517 | Container | 56.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +247% | 6.4 | 2,320 t | €39k | €8k |
| X-PRESS MULHACEN | 9365960 | Container | 46.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +187% | 11.4 | 11,719 t | €516k | €22k |
| X-PRESS SOUSSE | 9354349 | Container | 42.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +163% | 5.2 | 1,654 t | €44k | €0 |
| X-PRESS GODAVARI | 9353735 | Container | 39.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +140% | 10.4 | 10,508 t | €436k | €0 |
| X-PRESS AGILITY | 9483671 | Container | 38.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +138% | 9.8 | 11,651 t | €609k | €0 |
| X-PRESS ELBE | 9483669 | Container | 37.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +131% | 11.1 | 11,570 t | €560k | €0 |
| X-PRESS TAGUS | 9354375 | Container | 36.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +126% | 11.5 | 10,108 t | €454k | €0 |
| XPRESS NETRAVATI | 9348194 | Container | 31.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +96% | 11.8 | 28,099 t | €782k | €238k |
| EA GANNET | 9937476 | Container | 23.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +45% | 11.2 | 13,207 t | €672k | €42k |
| EA NODDY | 9937488 | Container | 23.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +42% | 11.0 | 13,348 t | €676k | €26k |
| ECO MAESTROAlt. fuel | 9985942 | Container | 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +35% | 10.6 | 8,887 t | €314k | €0 |
| ECO UMANDEAlt. fuel | 9959541 | Container | 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +28% | 10.3 | 7,093 t | €253k | €0 |
| X-PRESS SAGARMALA | 9862736 | Container | 19.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +21% | 10.0 | 13,377 t | €665k | €0 |
| X-PRESS SALWEEN | 9862748 | Container | 17.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +10% | 9.3 | 2,409 t | €121k | €0 |
| MEDITERRANEAN EXPRESS | 9622019 | Container | 16.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +1% | 12.7 | 26,697 t | €789k | €0 |
| X-PRESS ANTLIA | 9875381 | Container | 13.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | −16% | 11.9 | 6,221 t | €166k | €0 |
| MH PERSEUS | 9967433 | Container | 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | −35% | 15.4 | 19,862 t | €569k | €0 |
30 of 17 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.