Navalyze · Container · Ship

X-PRESS AGILITY

IMO: 9483671
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,283 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,283 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

89.4

Container median 177 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+138%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−26%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,692 t

CO₂ emitted

11,651 t

11,832 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,295 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,216 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 89.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 389 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 13.3 (−26%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+138%)

7.22Ranks 1,857 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,603 t).

Fuel burned laden

3,452 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

365 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+181 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

X-PRESS AGILITY
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

X-PRESS AGILITY
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

X-PRESS AGILITY
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	−11%	−26%	−4%	−14%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	−17%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.3 kn	+8%	+21%	+4%	+5%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	+4%	−12%	−11%	−10%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+3%	+0%	−4%	+17%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+12%	+16%	−10%	−9%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	−1%	+21%	+20%	−10%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	3,692	11,651	41,295	4,216	9.8	89.4	38.7	94%
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	4,310	13,535	42,823	3,648	11.7	101	44.8	85%
2023	not published	5,093	16,029	51,799	4,384	11.8	98.3	40.1	–
2022	not published	4,525	14,185	49,708	4,720	10.5	91.0	38.1	–
2021	not published	4,921	15,482	56,088	4,509	12.4	87.7	42.5	–
2020	not published	4,989	15,608	58,574	4,568	12.8	85.2	36.4	–
2019	not published	4,953	15,811	64,961	5,291	12.3	76.2	40.1	–
2018	not published	4,179	13,198	54,195	5,380	10.1	77.1	44.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	38.7	16.3	+138%	1,857 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	44.8	17.5	+156%	1,684 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	40.1	19.4	+107%	1,540 of 1,899	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	38.1	19.1	+99%	1,453 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	42.5	17.9	+138%	1,510 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	36.4	17.6	+107%	1,427 of 1,797	Korean Register	A
2019	not published	40.1	18.9	+112%	1,420 of 1,788	Korean Register	A
2018	not published	44.5	20.2	+120%	1,408 of 1,705	Korean Register	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.