Navalyze · Container · Ship

X-PRESS ELBE

IMO: 9483669
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,584 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,584 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.2

Container median 177 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

37.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+131%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,690 t

CO₂ emitted

11,570 t

11,752 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

40,456 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,637 h

152 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−48%)

78.8Ranks 420 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 37.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+131%)

7.22Ranks 1,841 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports79%
From the EU5%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU5%

92% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,667 t).

Fuel burned laden

3,354 t

91% of all fuel; 9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

524 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+182 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

X-PRESS ELBE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

X-PRESS ELBE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

X-PRESS ELBE
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−14%	−16%	−4%	−17%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+14%	+13%	−19%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+14%	+14%	−5%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+7%	−3%	−13%	−8%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−4%	−11%	+3%	+49%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+3%	+21%	−6%	−25%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−8%	−9%	+16%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	3,690	11,570	40,456	3,637	11.1	91.2	37.7	91%
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	4,467	14,010	42,187	3,708	11.4	106	45.3	78%
2023	not published	4,828	15,111	51,814	4,544	11.4	93.2	37.7	–
2022	not published	4,438	14,121	54,275	4,767	11.4	81.8	40.1	–
2021	not published	4,738	15,190	62,219	4,926	12.6	76.2	43.6	–
2020	not published	4,774	14,938	60,194	4,418	13.6	79.3	29.2	–
2019	not published	4,892	15,662	63,771	5,485	11.6	76.7	38.8	–
2018	not published	4,586	14,576	54,848	4,692	11.7	83.6	46.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	37.7	16.3	+131%	1,841 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	45.3	17.5	+159%	1,692 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	37.7	19.4	+94%	1,502 of 1,899	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	40.1	19.1	+109%	1,486 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	43.6	17.9	+143%	1,523 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	29.2	17.6	+66%	1,324 of 1,797	Korean Register	A
2019	not published	38.8	18.9	+106%	1,400 of 1,788	Korean Register	A
2018	not published	46.5	20.2	+130%	1,434 of 1,705	Korean Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.