Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SELENKA

IMO: 9447067
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 6,528 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,528 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

58.1

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+88%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,004 t

CO₂ emitted

6,356 t

6,455 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

34,494 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,213 h

134 days, 37% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 58.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−27%)

52.8Ranks 218 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.1 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 40% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+88%)

7.93Ranks 1,146 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU30%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU3%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,165 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

161 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+99 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SELENKA
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SELENKA
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SELENKA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−2%	−8%	+24%	−9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−24%	−21%	−45%	−20%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−15%	−17%	+14%	−16%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+21%	+19%	+8%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+3%	−1%	−12%	+15%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	+14%	+44%	−0%	+46%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−6%	+11%	+39%	–	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	2,004	6,356	34,494	3,213	10.7	58.1	28.2	–
2024	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	1,662	5,218	27,904	2,450	11.4	59.5	31.1	–
2023	not published	3,991	12,671	51,013	4,628	11.0	78.2	38.7	–
2022	not published	4,113	13,187	44,764	3,959	11.3	91.9	46.2	–
2021	not published	3,139	10,064	41,324	3,579	11.5	76.0	44.5	–
2020	not published	3,476	11,096	46,994	3,916	12.0	74.0	38.7	–
2019	not published	3,060	9,684	47,017	4,978	9.4	65.1	26.4	–
2018	not published	2,341	7,359	33,913	4,232	8.0	69.0	38,175	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	28.2	15.0	+88%	1,146 of 1,460	Verifavia	B
2024	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	31.1	16.7	+86%	1,006 of 1,274	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	38.7	16.2	+138%	1,131 of 1,314	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	46.2	16.1	+188%	1,322 of 1,409	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	44.5	16.7	+167%	1,233 of 1,343	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	38.7	16.2	+139%	1,161 of 1,312	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	26.4	17.3	+52%	983 of 1,321	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.