Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

IVER BRILLIANT

IMO
9616761
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
2,104 t
Flag (estimated)
Netherlands
Port of registry
Breskens
Technical efficiency
EIV 22.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Iver Ships BV

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,104 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
50.1
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−37%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
75.5
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+402%)
Average speed
9.5 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−14%)
Fuel per day at sea
11.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,149 t
CO₂ emitted
6,818 t
6,924 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
42,920 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,539 h
189 days, 52% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 50.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−37%)
52.8Ranks 108 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 11.1 (−14%)
8.8Faster than 17% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 75.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+402%)
7.93Ranks 1,437 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports39%
  • From the EU26%
  • Into the EU29%
  • At berth in the EU7%

73% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,959 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
452 t
6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+106 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • IVER BRILLIANT
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • IVER BRILLIANT
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • IVER BRILLIANT
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.4 kn−6%+10%−16%+3%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.7 kn+8%−10%−3%+19%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−1.7 kn+13%−4%+5%−6%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.6 kn−16%−12%−0%−5%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+1.1 kn+13%+26%−1%+13%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+3.9 kn−22%+28%+40%−13%3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.6 kn+5%+18%+4%+0%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Iver Ships BV2,1496,81842,9204,5399.550.175.5–
2024Iver Ships BV2,7448,62951,2536,3478.153.573.2–
2023not published2,6238,23652,9625,4119.849.561.5–
2022not published2,2086,97650,4264,37611.543.865.5–
2021not published2,6448,47050,4594,63710.952.468.7–
2020not published2,3537,50350,7575,1769.846.460.9–
2019not published2,1716,79536,3026,1345.959.870.2–
2018not published1,9906,21034,9616,6345.356.970.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Iver Ships BV75.515.0+402%1,437 of 1,460RINAB
2024Iver Ships BV73.216.7+338%1,251 of 1,274RINAB
2023not published61.516.2+279%1,271 of 1,314RINAB
2022not published65.516.1+308%1,379 of 1,409RINAB
2021not published68.716.7+312%1,322 of 1,343RINAB
2020not published60.916.2+277%1,279 of 1,312RINAB
2019not published70.217.3+305%1,296 of 1,321RINAB
2018not published70.117.1+309%1,258 of 1,294RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.