Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.Ayour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 60 |
| CO₂ emitted | 2.1 Mt |
| Fuel per mile | 152 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 16.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Ro-pax |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 547
- GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A953 (+74% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 233
- GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A101 (−56% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A | 14 | 953 101 freight | +74% −56% freight | 210 | 18.1 | 5,563 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 547 233 freight | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 97.5
- GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A71.7 (−26% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A | 22 | 71.7 | −26% | 141 | 16.3 | 5,323 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 97.5 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3
- GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A73.6 (+33% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A | 19 | 73.6 | +33% | 104 | 15.0 | 3,627 | 3.3% | – |
| Segment median | 55.3 | 0% |
Con-ro
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 9.4
- GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A9.5 (+2% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A | 5 | 9.5 | +2% | 123 | 14.7 | 5,272 | 5.4% | – |
| Segment median | 9.4 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A | RINA (60) | 95% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLORENCIA | 9287584 | Ro-pax | 2,186 g CO₂/pax·nm 77.6 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +300% −67% | 19.3 | 58,635 t | €1.8m |
| VENEZIA | 9304631 | Ro-pax | 2,004 g CO₂/pax·nm 77.0 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +267% −67% | 16.9 | 50,946 t | €1.5m |
| CORFU' | 9349758 | Ro-pax | 1,611 g CO₂/pax·nm 95.1 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +195% −59% | 17.3 | 37,493 t | €1.1m |
| CRUISE AUSONIA | 9227429 | Ro-pax | 1,035 g CO₂/pax·nm 120 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +89% −48% | 18.8 | 45,727 t | €1.4m |
| CRUISE BONARIA | 9204063 | Ro-pax | 1,024 g CO₂/pax·nm 116 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +87% −50% | 18.6 | 69,651 t | €2.1m |
| EUROPA PALACE | 9198939 | Ro-pax | 1,012 g CO₂/pax·nm 64.4 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +85% −72% | 18.6 | 64,554 t | €1.9m |
| CRUISE BARCELONA | 9351488 | Ro-pax | 953 g CO₂/pax·nm 68.7 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +74% −70% | 21.7 | 124,615 t | €3.7m |
| CRUISE ROMA | 9351476 | Ro-pax | 933 g CO₂/pax·nm 72.1 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +71% −69% | 21.5 | 109,712 t | €3.3m |
| GRANDE HOUSTON | 9782699 | Vehicle carrier | 263 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +66% | 16.6 | 10,192 t | €167k |
| EUROCARGO GENOVA | 9458951 | Ro-ro | 80.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 51.9 | +54% | 16.4 | 42,382 t | €1.3m |
| CATANIA | 9261554 | Ro-pax | 777 g CO₂/pax·nm 123 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +42% −47% | 17.3 | 50,010 t | €1.1m |
| ZEUS PALACE | 9208071 | Ro-pax | 752 g CO₂/pax·nm 112 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +38% −52% | 14.3 | 56,021 t | €1.7m |
| ECO MEDITERRANEA | 9859595 | Ro-ro | 66.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 51.9 | +28% | 17.0 | 40,489 t | €1.0m |
| EUROCARGO PALERMO | 9465538 | Ro-ro | 96.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 75.4 | +28% | 17.0 | 43,795 t | €1.3m |
| EUROCARGO ALEXANDRIA | 9465540 | Ro-ro | 93.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 75.4 | +24% | 17.4 | 39,536 t | €1.2m |
| EUROCARGO RAVENNA | 9471056 | Ro-ro | 93.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 75.4 | +23% | 16.4 | 32,895 t | €983k |
| GRANDE HALIFAX | 9784051 | Vehicle carrier | 67.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | +22% | 15.5 | 19,180 t | €340k |
| EUROCARGO CAGLIARI | 9471068 | Ro-ro | 126 g CO₂/t·nm | 105 | +20% | 14.3 | 29,071 t | €622k |
| EUROCARGO MALTA | 9465514 | Ro-ro | 89.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 75.4 | +19% | 17.2 | 43,557 t | €1.3m |
| ECO MALTA | 9859583 | Ro-ro | 59.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 51.9 | +14% | 16.9 | 35,973 t | €885k |
| GRANDE EUROPA | 9138381 | Con-ro | 10.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.4 | +12% | 14.7 | 33,111 t | €843k |
| EUROCARGO VENEZIA | 9465552 | Ro-ro | 84.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 75.4 | +12% | 17.5 | 38,437 t | €1.2m |
| ECO BARCELONA | 9859545 | Ro-ro | 57.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 51.9 | +10% | 17.9 | 47,892 t | €1.4m |
| EUROCARGO LIVORNO | 9471070 | Ro-ro | 115 g CO₂/t·nm | 105 | +10% | 14.5 | 33,771 t | €566k |
| GRANDE ITALIA | 9227912 | Vehicle carrier | 80.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 73.3 | +9% | 14.1 | 20,705 t | €422k |
| GRANDE CALIFORNIA | 9796377 | Vehicle carrier | 59.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | +8% | 15.9 | 21,548 t | €351k |
| GRANDE DETROIT | 9293272 | Vehicle carrier | 78.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 73.3 | +7% | 13.9 | 22,746 t | €490k |
| GRAND BENELUX | 9227900 | Vehicle carrier | 77.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 73.3 | +6% | 14.0 | 17,124 t | €346k |
| GRANDE BALTIMORA | 9784037 | Vehicle carrier | 58.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | +5% | 15.8 | 17,419 t | €239k |
| GRANDE SCANDINAVIA | 9220615 | Con-ro | 9.8 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.4 | +5% | 14.1 | 26,555 t | €609k |
30 of 60 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.