Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

ATLANSHIP S.A.your view

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

	ATLANSHIP S.A.
Ships	8
CO₂ emitted	108 kt
Fuel kg/nm	104
Average speed	14.0 kn
CO₂ at berth	3.5%
Ships burning LNG	0
Ships using alternative fuel	0
Main segment	Reefer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Reefer

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 58.7

ATLANSHIP S.A.29.0 (−51% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Shipsin reefer	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship	vs reefer medianlower is better	Fuel kg/nmfleet avg.	Average speedknots at sea	Hours at seaper ship per year	CO₂ at berthshare	LNG / alt. fuelships
ATLANSHIP S.A.	6	29.0	−51%	89	13.7	2,561	4.4%	–
Segment median		58.7	0%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

ATLANSHIP S.A.71.8 (+310% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Shipsin container	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship	vs container medianlower is better	Fuel kg/nmfleet avg.	Average speedknots at sea	Hours at seaper ship per year	CO₂ at berthshare	LNG / alt. fuelships
ATLANSHIP S.A.	2	71.8	+310%	130	14.7	4,157	2.5%	–
Segment median		17.5	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
ATLANSHIP S.A.	ABS (8)	100%	0%	0%	0%

ATLANSHIP S.A.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Segment median	vs median	Average speed	CO₂	Allowances	Cost of gap
CHIQUITA EXPRESS	9304758	Container	84.3 g CO₂/t·nm	17.5	+381%	14.8	21,678 t	€335k	€148k
CHIQUITA TRADER	9304760	Container	59.3 g CO₂/t·nm	17.5	+238%	14.7	28,178 t	€431k	€88k
ORANGE WAVE	9057123	Reefer	46.4 g CO₂/t·nm	58.7	−21%	14.6	13,030 t	€216k	€0
ORANGE BLOSSOM 2	9675406	Reefer	36.8 g CO₂/t·nm	58.7	−37%	13.7	3,344 t	€51k	€0
ORANGE SUN	9342580	Reefer	30.2 g CO₂/t·nm	58.7	−48%	15.5	13,251 t	€203k	€0
ORANGE OCEAN	9675391	Reefer	27.7 g CO₂/t·nm	58.7	−53%	14.0	2,587 t	€40k	€0
ORANGE SKY	9228370	Reefer	23.0 g CO₂/t·nm	58.7	−61%	13.1	10,090 t	€156k	€0
ORANGE STAR	9564384	Reefer	18.8 g CO₂/t·nm	58.7	−68%	12.4	15,896 t	€246k	€0

30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.