Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

AET

4 ISM companies in this group, 2024. Untick a company to leave it out of the figures.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

AET
Ships6
CO₂ emitted123,718 t
Fuel kg/nm241
Average speed8.7 kn
CO₂ at berth9.6%
Ships burning LNG2
Ships using alternative fuel0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.06

  • AET16.3 (+102%)
  • ← betterworse →
Shipsin oil tankerCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median shipvs oil tanker medianlower is betterFuel kg/nmfleet avg.Average speedknots at seaHours at seaper ship per yearCO₂ at berthshareLNG / alt. fuelships
AET616.3+102%2418.73,2209.6%2 / 0
Segment median 8.060%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
AETDNV (4), Lloyd's Register (2)33%67%67%0%

AET: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSegment medianvs medianAverage speedCO₂AllowancesCost of gap
EAGLE BARENTS9676125Oil tanker34.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.06+331%7.525,483 t€635k€454k
EAGLE BLANE9833101Oil tanker19.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.06+137%7.824,946 t€564k€271k
EAGLE BALDERLNG9833113Oil tanker16.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.06+103%7.818,348 t€422k€206k
EAGLE BERGEN9676137Oil tanker16.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.06+101%8.833,087 t€855k€412k
EAGLE LE HAVRE9795103Oil tanker4.70 g CO₂/t·nm8.06−42%11.06,778 t€110k€0
EAGLE VALENCELNG9910234Oil tanker2.02 g CO₂/t·nm8.06−75%11.815,076 t€229k€0

30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.