Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- AETyour view
AET
4 ISM companies in this group, 2025. Untick a company to leave it out of the figures.
- AET SEA SHUTTLE AS2 ships · same name
- AET SEA SHUTTLE II AS2 ships · same name
- AET Bermuda One Limited1 ship · same name
- AET Tankers VLCC PTE LTD1 ship · same name
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| AET | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 6 |
| CO₂ emitted | 96,382 t−22.1% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 234 |
| Average speed | 8.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 8.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.95
- AET19.0 (+138% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin oil tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs oil tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AET | 6 | 19.0 | +138% | 234 | 8.1 | 3,949 | 8.6% | – |
| Segment median | 7.95 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AET | DNV (4), Lloyd's Register (2) | 17% | 100% | 67% | 0% |
AET: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAGLE BERGEN | 9676137 | Oil tanker | 21.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +169% | 7.5 | 25,143 t | €969k | €498k |
| EAGLE BARENTS | 9676125 | Oil tanker | 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +161% | 7.9 | 21,626 t | €775k | €469k |
| EAGLE BLANE | 9833101 | Oil tanker | 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +116% | 8.1 | 22,377 t | €1.0m | €404k |
| EAGLE BALDER | 9833113 | Oil tanker | 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +115% | 8.6 | 22,912 t | €875k | €343k |
30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.