Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- TT-Line GmbH & Co KGyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| TT-Line GmbH & Co KG | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 9 |
| CO₂ emitted | 377 kt+23.8% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 154 |
| Average speed | 14.7 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Ro-pax |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 567
- TT-Line GmbH & Co KG1,328 (+134% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 253
- TT-Line GmbH & Co KG76.4 (−70% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin ro-pax | CO₂ per transport work (pax)g/pax·nm, median ship | vs ro-pax medianpax, freight below | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT-Line GmbH & Co KG | 9 | 1,328 76.4 freight | +134% −70% freight | 154 | 14.7 | 6,046 | 7.8% | 2 / 0 |
| Segment median | 567 253 freight | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT-Line GmbH & Co KG | Verifavia (9) | 44% | 11% | 56% | 0% |
TT-Line GmbH & Co KG: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKKA | 9217230 | Ro-pax | 2,171 g CO₂/pax·nm 103 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +283% −59% | 18.4 | 80,244 t | €4.2m | €3.1m |
| ROBIN HOOD | 9087477 | Ro-pax | 1,385 g CO₂/pax·nm 70.9 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +144% −72% | 14.6 | 35,784 t | €1.9m | €1.1m |
| NILS DACKE | 9087465 | Ro-pax | 1,364 g CO₂/pax·nm 72.7 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +141% −71% | 15.3 | 35,392 t | €1.9m | €1.1m |
| MARCO POLO | 9019080 | Ro-pax | 1,345 g CO₂/pax·nm 84.1 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +137% −67% | 15.1 | 22,991 t | €1.2m | €699k |
| TINKER BELL | 9217242 | Ro-pax | 1,328 g CO₂/pax·nm 76.4 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +134% −70% | 14.0 | 56,103 t | €2.9m | €1.7m |
| TOM SAWYER | 8703232 | Ro-pax | 1,066 g CO₂/pax·nm 97.5 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +88% −61% | 13.6 | 35,907 t | €1.9m | €883k |
| HUCKLEBERRY FINN | 8618358 | Ro-pax | 1,021 g CO₂/pax·nm 93.5 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +80% −63% | 12.7 | 32,640 t | €1.7m | €763k |
| PETER PANLNG | 9880946 | Ro-pax | 769 g CO₂/pax·nm 47.9 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +36% −81% | 14.3 | 38,720 t | €1.4m | €365k |
| NILS HOLGERSSONLNG | 9865685 | Ro-pax | 745 g CO₂/pax·nm 44.2 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +31% −82% | 14.4 | 38,964 t | €1.4m | €325k |
30 of 9 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.