Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- AM Nomikos Transworld Maritimeyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| AM Nomikos Transworld Maritime | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 18 |
| CO₂ emitted | 81 kt−36.9% |
| Fuel per mile | 94 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- AM Nomikos Transworld Maritime6.5 (−18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM Nomikos Transworld Maritime | 17 | 6.5 | −18% | 85 | 11.0 | 1,305 | 3.2% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- AM Nomikos Transworld Maritime18.9 (+16% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM Nomikos Transworld Maritime | 1 | 18.9 | +16% | 166 | 10.2 | 3,146 | 1.8% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM Nomikos Transworld Maritime | ABS (18) | 6% | 94% | 0% | 0% |
AM Nomikos Transworld Maritime: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VICTORIA | 9738466 | Bulk carrier | 15.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +95% | 12.3 | 1,515 t | €40k | €0 |
| ATLANTICA POWER | 9467055 | Container | 18.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +16% | 10.2 | 16,707 t | €447k | €0 |
| KAMARI | 9412634 | Bulk carrier | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +13% | 8.3 | 3,830 t | €135k | €15k |
| NIKOS N | 9412646 | Bulk carrier | 8.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +11% | 11.0 | 2,599 t | €94k | €8k |
| ASTRA N | 9476290 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +7% | 11.5 | 5,167 t | €137k | €8k |
| EFFY N | 9509516 | Bulk carrier | 8.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +1% | 10.6 | 3,359 t | €99k | €0 |
| ANGELINA THE GREAT N | 9593725 | Bulk carrier | 7.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −5% | 8.6 | 1,875 t | €54k | €7k |
| ARAMIS | 9593359 | Bulk carrier | 7.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −6% | 11.4 | 3,180 t | €92k | €0 |
| ARMONIA | 9638496 | Bulk carrier | 7.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −11% | 10.4 | 3,609 t | €110k | €7k |
| PMS SEAGULL | 9614971 | Bulk carrier | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −18% | 10.8 | 6,126 t | €170k | €0 |
| ANGELE N | 9509528 | Bulk carrier | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −20% | 11.6 | 7,179 t | €192k | €0 |
| TN DAWN | 9373993 | Bulk carrier | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −21% | 11.8 | 7,755 t | €213k | €0 |
| ARIADNE | 9492907 | Bulk carrier | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −23% | 11.7 | 4,145 t | €114k | €0 |
| LEON | 9303871 | Bulk carrier | 5.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −25% | 10.9 | 2,622 t | €69k | €0 |
| APHROS | 9460514 | Bulk carrier | 5.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −25% | 10.5 | 5,026 t | €144k | €0 |
| SAN ANTONIO | 9514066 | Bulk carrier | 5.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −26% | 11.9 | 3,243 t | €99k | €0 |
| AVRA | 9859791 | Bulk carrier | 5.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −32% | 12.2 | 3,120 t | €86k | €8k |
| NM SAKURA | 9703643 | Bulk carrier | 4.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −41% | 10.9 | 338 t | €9k | €0 |
30 of 18 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.