Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited
Ships85
CO₂ emitted204 kt−8.9%
Fuel per mile95 kg/nm
Average speed11.7 kn
CO₂ at berth5.8%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentBulk carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited8.8 (+11%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited458.8+11%9012.16883.9%–
Segment median 7.90%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited7.2 (−10%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited157.2−10%11311.11,6426.2%–
Segment median 8.00%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited15.5 (+3%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited1315.5+3%8710.79797.5%–
Segment median 15.00%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited25.3 (+55%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited1225.3+55%8713.71,7297.3%–
Segment median 16.30%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Eastern Mediterranean Maritime LimitedRINA (85)0%100%0%0%

Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
ADA9727156Bulk carrier55.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+256%12.21,822 t€50k
POLES9254989Bulk carrier35.7 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+130%11.22,775 t€73k
ELIAS9490777Bulk carrier11.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+44%12.21,723 t€48k
YPAPANTI9693082Oil tanker14.8 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+42%10.72,979 t€87k
SEAGUARDIAN9174268Bulk carrier11.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+40%13.9598 t€18k
PAREA9433652Bulk carrier13.1 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+38%12.72,616 t€83k
HAPPY LADY9644225Chemical tanker20.6 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+35%8.12,451 t€89k
FILIA9490868Bulk carrier8.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+35%11.31,855 t€49k
BIRDIE9726243Bulk carrier19.9 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+28%11.92,087 t€68k
LUCKY LADY9288796Chemical tanker14.5 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+26%10.13,212 t€102k
SANTA CRUZ9442495Bulk carrier10.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+25%11.43,539 t€95k
ZEA9628087Bulk carrier6.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+24%13.52,151 t€59k
GEORGIA9302683Chemical tanker18.4 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+21%11.51,612 t€63k
ATHINA III9247285Bulk carrier11.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+21%12.19,787 t€277k
GLYFADA9714733Bulk carrier9.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+18%12.71,968 t€53k
ATHINA M9644237Chemical tanker17.8 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+17%9.44,031 t€112k
ELBELLA9312640Container25.9 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+17%13.010,431 t€448k
MAINA9699892Bulk carrier9.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+15%12.42,168 t€60k
STAVROS9425875Bulk carrier8.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+12%12.71,524 t€41k
CHANCE9939890Container24.6 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+11%13.23,994 t€95k
CYCLADES9799616Bulk carrier5.4 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+11%12.01,350 t€36k
PESSADA9174270Bulk carrier8.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+10%13.43,120 t€90k
LADYBUG9391385Chemical tanker16.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+8%10.53,854 t€115k
MANNA9304100Bulk carrier7.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+7%12.92,814 t€80k
SAINT MYRON9675597Bulk carrier6.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+5%11.82,595 t€70k
YANNIS9401910Bulk carrier8.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+5%12.51,465 t€40k
MERONAS9934905Oil tanker10.9 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+4%9.84,695 t€153k
IRINI9934890Oil tanker10.8 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+4%11.13,758 t€103k
FAIR LADY9342877Bulk carrier6.8 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+3%13.32,259 t€61k
STEMNITSA9693070Oil tanker4.6 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+1%11.38,272 t€245k

30 of 85 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.