Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited
Ships9
CO₂ emitted36,321 t+21.4%
Fuel kg/nm84.8
Average speed10.9 kn
CO₂ at berth4.0%
Ships burning LNG0
Ships using alternative fuel0
Main segmentBulk carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.90

  • Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited7.35 (−7%)
  • ← betterworse →
Shipsin bulk carrierCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median shipvs bulk carrier medianlower is betterFuel kg/nmfleet avg.Average speedknots at seaHours at seaper ship per yearCO₂ at berthshareLNG / alt. fuelships
Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited97.35−7%84.810.91,3904.0%–
Segment median 7.900%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company LimitedDNV (9)0%0%100%0%

Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSegment medianvs medianAverage speedCO₂AllowancesCost of gap
GREAT PROGRESS9728655Bulk carrier13.1 g CO₂/t·nm7.90+65%11.42,138 t€58k€0
PACIFIC VICTORY9731896Bulk carrier9.13 g CO₂/t·nm7.90+16%11.17,883 t€213k€0
PACIFIC CONSTANT9712888Bulk carrier8.81 g CO₂/t·nm7.90+12%12.11,865 t€58k€6k
GREAT RAINBOW9738492Bulk carrier8.04 g CO₂/t·nm7.90+2%11.02,663 t€79k€825
PACIFIC ACHIEVEMENT9712917Bulk carrier7.35 g CO₂/t·nm7.90−7%10.52,265 t€76k€0
PACIFIC ACTIVITY9731901Bulk carrier7.06 g CO₂/t·nm7.90−11%10.47,294 t€225k€15k
GREAT FLUENCY9728679Bulk carrier7.05 g CO₂/t·nm7.90−11%11.73,711 t€112k€0
GREAT VISION9728681Bulk carrier6.30 g CO₂/t·nm7.90−20%10.31,469 t€40k€0
PACIFIC VALOR9712503Bulk carrier5.57 g CO₂/t·nm7.90−30%10.77,031 t€219k€0

30 of 9 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.