Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH
Ships34
CO₂ emitted320 kt−23.5%
Fuel per mile138 kg/nm
Average speed10.1 kn
CO₂ at berth10.1%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH7.3 (−8%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH217.3−8%1539.82,50910.5%–
Segment median 8.00%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH9.0 (−40%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH109.0−40%10410.81,7019.9%–
Segment median 15.00%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH43.7 (+168%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH343.7+168%9910.51,5025.2%–
Segment median 16.30%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbHABS (31), DNV (3)100%0%0%0%

Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
GOLDEN DAISY9878008Chemical tanker29.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+92%9.114,714 t€442k
NORTH LOYALTY9537771Oil tanker8.4 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+83%11.218,445 t€620k
SAFEEN BARONESS9460576Oil tanker17.7 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+71%6.915,007 t€467k
SAFEEN ELONA9488011Oil tanker13.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+61%7.220,796 t€681k
ALTAI9446427Oil tanker12.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+56%9.216,859 t€521k
ALATAU9416551Oil tanker12.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+50%9.318,825 t€576k
SAFEEN ELIZABETH9524449Oil tanker8.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+33%10.212,692 t€357k
PS AMALFI9439395Oil tanker7.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+25%9.27,135 t€247k
CAPE TEMPEST9407263Chemical tanker14.4 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+25%12.93,057 t€87k
NORDIC STAR9748679Oil tanker5.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+21%10.212,284 t€501k
PERSEUS STAR9891684Oil tanker7.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+16%10.115,390 t€509k
CAPE TAMPA9441166Chemical tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+15%11.15,189 t€147k
SILVER ORLA9682332Chemical tanker8.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+9%10.95,014 t€143k
SILVER CINDY9682368Chemical tanker8.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+5%10.53,387 t€104k
MINDORO STAR9441207Chemical tanker11.6 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+1%11.19,400 t€259k
PACIFIC DEBBIE9772058Chemical tanker8.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−2%10.52,000 t€55k
ATLANTIC NORTH9236597Container43.7 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−3%10.54,931 t€163k
SILVER ELLIE9692387Chemical tanker7.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−11%10.75,156 t€151k
AIGEORGIS9891660Oil tanker7.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−11%10.820,664 t€649k
AIFANOURIOS9891696Oil tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−12%11.117,682 t€580k
SILVER ELEANOR9692301Chemical tanker6.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−17%11.72,850 t€76k
PEGASUS STAR9891672Oil tanker5.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−19%10.512,173 t€345k
SILVER EMILY9682356Chemical tanker9.1 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−21%11.69,536 t€286k
ANGEL STAR9292345Oil tanker8.2 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−21%12.02,940 t€92k
MH GLADIATOR1023932Oil tanker6.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−21%10.415,284 t€424k
WEST LOYALTY9537757Oil tanker3.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−24%10.311,204 t€320k
BALTIC LOYALTY9411953Oil tanker3.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−24%11.72,473 t€75k
SILVER VALERIE9682320Oil tanker7.5 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−28%10.92,861 t€84k
SILVER HANNAH9682409Oil tanker7.1 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−32%11.4895 t€23k
SILVER MILLIE9692363Oil tanker6.5 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−37%11.91,081 t€33k

30 of 34 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.