Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Amoysailing Maritime Co Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Amoysailing Maritime Co Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 12,224 t+82.9% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 85.7 |
| Average speed | 9.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.90
- Amoysailing Maritime Co Ltd14.3 (+81% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin bulk carrier | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs bulk carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amoysailing Maritime Co Ltd | 7 | 14.3 | +81% | 85.7 | 9.3 | 696 | 6.6% | – |
| Segment median | 7.90 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amoysailing Maritime Co Ltd | ABS (6), Bureau Veritas (1) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Amoysailing Maritime Co Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANS AUTUMN | 9615470 | Bulk carrier | 70.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | +796% | 8.1 | 193 t | €7k | €5k |
| AMOY DREAM | 9801706 | Bulk carrier | 41.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | +422% | 11.3 | 606 t | €17k | €11k |
| TRANS SPRING | 9615482 | Bulk carrier | 23.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | +191% | 10.5 | 498 t | €15k | €5k |
| AMOY CENTURY | 9797008 | Bulk carrier | 14.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | +81% | 6.6 | 972 t | €31k | €10k |
| AMOY ACTION | 9583029 | Bulk carrier | 12.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | +52% | 6.9 | 2,387 t | €77k | €16k |
| KING LOONG | 9304124 | Bulk carrier | 7.98 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | +1% | 11.6 | 4,174 t | €111k | €300 |
| AMOY SUNNY | 9342841 | Bulk carrier | 7.33 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | −7% | 9.5 | 3,394 t | €97k | €0 |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.