Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Chesva Enterprises Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Chesva Enterprises Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 3 |
| CO₂ emitted | 8,557 t−41.4% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 96 |
| Average speed | 7.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Chesva Enterprises Ltd9.4 (+19% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin bulk carrier | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs bulk carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chesva Enterprises Ltd | 2 | 9.4 | +19% | 110 | 7.5 | 1,465 | 2.2% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- Chesva Enterprises Ltd11.7 (−54% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin general cargo | CO₂ per transport work (dwt)g/dwt·nm, median ship | vs general cargo medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chesva Enterprises Ltd | 1 | 11.7 | −54% | 47 | 7.8 | 828 | 5.2% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
Chesva Enterprises Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARIZONA | 9592733 | Bulk carrier | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +25% | 6.4 | 4,754 t | €134k | €44k |
| ANARITA | 9636008 | Bulk carrier | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +14% | 9.9 | 2,844 t | €76k | €9k |
| GRAIN WAY | 9545560 | General cargo | 11.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −54% | 7.8 | 960 t | €36k | €0 |
30 of 3 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.