Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- KNOT Management ASyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| KNOT Management AS | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 14 |
| CO₂ emitted | 250 kt+22.3% |
| Fuel per mile | 249 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 7.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 8.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- KNOT Management AS22.4 (+182% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KNOT Management AS | 14 | 22.4 | +182% | 249 | 7.1 | 3,221 | 8.7% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KNOT Management AS | DNV (14) | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
KNOT Management AS: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HILDA KNUTSEN | 9628300 | Oil tanker | 35.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +245% | 5.8 | 32,994 t | €1.5m |
| WINDSOR KNUTSEN | 9316115 | Oil tanker | 26.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +222% | 6.8 | 6,640 t | €174k |
| SINDRE KNUTSEN | 9905928 | Oil tanker | 24.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +197% | 7.3 | 30,179 t | €1.1m |
| SIRI KNUTSEN | 9247168 | Oil tanker | 77.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +186% | 5.3 | 10,076 t | €356k |
| TORILL KNUTSEN | 9630030 | Oil tanker | 20.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +149% | 7.1 | 30,490 t | €1.0m |
| BODIL KNUTSEN | 9472529 | Oil tanker | 18.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +125% | 8.3 | 34,153 t | €1.2m |
| INGRID KNUTSEN | 9649225 | Oil tanker | 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +86% | 7.0 | 19,218 t | €725k |
| FRIDA KNUTSEN | 9905916 | Oil tanker | 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +77% | 8.8 | 18,216 t | €610k |
| GIJON KNUTSEN | 9313527 | Oil tanker | 43.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +59% | 6.8 | 14,050 t | €674k |
| SYNNØVE KNUTSEN | 9868388 | Oil tanker | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +59% | 8.3 | 8,425 t | €220k |
| DAN CISNE | 9513440 | Oil tanker | 42.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +55% | 6.6 | 17,580 t | €744k |
| TOVE KNUTSEN | 9868376 | Oil tanker | 9.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +53% | 7.9 | 7,184 t | €187k |
| TUVA KNUTSEN | 9887968 | Oil tanker | 6.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +44% | 9.5 | 4,587 t | €127k |
| DAN SABIA | 9513438 | Oil tanker | 30.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +10% | 6.6 | 16,007 t | €627k |
30 of 14 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.