Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Minerva
Ships56
CO₂ emitted451 kt−30.1%
Fuel per mile134 kg/nm
Average speed8.2 kn
CO₂ at berth6.9%
Ships burning LNG4
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Minerva9.3 (+16%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Minerva439.3+16%1397.52,3477.7%–
Segment median 8.00%

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1

  • Minerva7.7 (+8%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Minerva47.7+8%16813.62,3452.5%4
Segment median 7.10%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Minerva20.6 (+37%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Minerva420.6+37%1057.22,79711.2%–
Segment median 15.00%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Minerva22.1 (+36%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Minerva322.1+36%7412.02,4264.5%–
Segment median 16.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Minerva5.3 (−33%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Minerva25.3−33%1309.82,1192.1%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MinervaABS (56)100%0%7%0%

Minerva: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
MINERVA LEO9723289Chemical tanker143 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+266%2.02,428 t€72k
MINERVA CLARA9297333Oil tanker14.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+210%1.214 t€375
MINERVA AMORGOSLNG9885855LNG carrier16.9 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+137%15.012,938 t€345k
APOLYTARES9419474Oil tanker8.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+80%7.14,865 t€141k
MINERVA KYTHNOS9592252Oil tanker13.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+66%4.720,809 t€676k
MINERVA MARINA9411939Oil tanker7.6 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+65%5.17,421 t€275k
MINERVA SYMPHONY9304605Oil tanker43.2 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+59%2.86,035 t€181k
MINERVA RITA9305867Oil tanker43.0 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+58%11.32,496 t€85k
ANDROMEDA9352561Oil tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+57%4.810,936 t€301k
MINERVA DOXA9304617Oil tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+56%6.13,223 t€91k
MINERVA LIBRA9317951Oil tanker12.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+52%6.612,926 t€377k
MINERVA CHIOSLNG9877341LNG carrier9.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+31%13.84,186 t€112k
MINERVA ANNA9298507Oil tanker13.5 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+30%8.33,973 t€110k
MINERVA SOPHIA9382762Oil tanker10.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+22%4.418,656 t€597k
MINERVA TYCHI9723291Chemical tanker25.3 g CO₂/t·nm21.4+18%9.214,022 t€622k
MINERVA JOY9363479Oil tanker12.3 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+18%6.27,455 t€223k
MINERVA ELEFTHERIA9787168Oil tanker9.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+17%7.610,419 t€305k
MINERVA GEORGIA9332157Oil tanker5.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+16%10.216,006 t€460k
MINERVA OLYMPIA9787194Oil tanker9.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+13%5.81,890 t€58k
MINERVA PACIFICA9325831Oil tanker11.5 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+11%6.06,178 t€205k
AMALTHEA9298650Oil tanker9.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+10%7.913,335 t€382k
MINERVA ZEN9410909Chemical tanker12.7 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+10%10.17,334 t€243k
MINERVA EVROPI9785237Oil tanker4.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+7%10.324,667 t€937k
LITTLE EMMA9980356Container23.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+7%11.512,364 t€533k
MINERVA ARIES9412177Oil tanker8.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+7%10.412,466 t€342k
MINERVA ELPIDA9440526Oil tanker6.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+7%10.43,427 t€96k
DOUKATO9840659Bulk carrier7.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+7%10.94,888 t€136k
MINERVA JOANNA9380386Oil tanker28.9 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+7%3.93,224 t€103k
MINERVA ANTONIA9380398Oil tanker11.0 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+6%8.05,124 t€157k
MINERVA JULIE9380831Chemical tanker16.0 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+5%6.12,676 t€95k

30 of 56 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.