Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Oman Ship Management Company SAOCyour view

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

	Oman Ship Management Company SAOC
Ships	18
CO₂ emitted	165,177 t
Fuel kg/nm	138
Average speed	10.8 kn
CO₂ at berth	5.1%
Ships burning LNG	1
Ships using alternative fuel	0
Main segment	Oil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.06

Oman Ship Management Company SAOC4.37 (−46% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Shipsin oil tanker	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship	vs oil tanker medianlower is better	Fuel kg/nmfleet avg.	Average speedknots at sea	Hours at seaper ship per year	CO₂ at berthshare	LNG / alt. fuelships
Oman Ship Management Company SAOC	8	4.37	−46%	215	9.4	1,798	5.7%	–
Segment median		8.06	0%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

Oman Ship Management Company SAOC11.4 (−32% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Shipsin chemical tanker	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship	vs chemical tanker medianlower is better	Fuel kg/nmfleet avg.	Average speedknots at sea	Hours at seaper ship per year	CO₂ at berthshare	LNG / alt. fuelships
Oman Ship Management Company SAOC	5	11.4	−32%	87.1	11.7	2,340	6.8%	–
Segment median		16.7	0%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.09

Oman Ship Management Company SAOC6.76 (−17% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Shipsin bulk carrier	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship	vs bulk carrier medianlower is better	Fuel kg/nmfleet avg.	Average speedknots at sea	Hours at seaper ship per year	CO₂ at berthshare	LNG / alt. fuelships
Oman Ship Management Company SAOC	4	6.76	−17%	89.5	11.6	2,071	2.5%	–
Segment median		8.09	0%

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.39

Oman Ship Management Company SAOC5.55 (−25% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Shipsin LNG carrier	CO₂ per transport work (volume)g/m³·nm, median ship	vs LNG carrier medianlower is better	Fuel kg/nmfleet avg.	Average speedknots at sea	Hours at seaper ship per year	CO₂ at berthshare	LNG / alt. fuelships
Oman Ship Management Company SAOC	1	5.55	−25%	213	13.9	1,224	0.8%	1 / 0
Segment median		7.39	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
Oman Ship Management Company SAOC	ABS (18)	0%	100%	100%	0%

Oman Ship Management Company SAOC: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Segment median	vs median	Average speed	CO₂	Allowances	Cost of gap
JABAL AL KAWR	9732943	Bulk carrier	8.79 g CO₂/t·nm	8.09	+9%	11.2	8,642 t	€152k	€11k
HABRUT	9500730	Oil tanker	7.27 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−10%	6.7	22,339 t	€365k	€139k
AL AMERAT	9405851	Chemical tanker	14.7 g CO₂/t·nm	16.7	−12%	12.6	9,704 t	€166k	€0
JABAL HARIM	9722053	Bulk carrier	7.03 g CO₂/t·nm	8.09	−13%	11.8	4,904 t	€80k	€4k
OCEAN LOYALTY	9375238	Oil tanker	6.71 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−17%	7.0	9,157 t	€149k	€49k
JABAL HAFIT	9735804	Bulk carrier	6.48 g CO₂/t·nm	8.09	−20%	11.6	9,584 t	€152k	€0
ADAM LNGLNG	9501186	LNG carrier	5.55 g CO₂/m³·nm	7.39	−25%	13.9	9,958 t	€151k	€0
JABAL AR RAWDAH	9722041	Bulk carrier	5.83 g CO₂/t·nm	8.09	−28%	12.0	3,728 t	€58k	€0
DANK SILVER	9718806	Chemical tanker	11.6 g CO₂/t·nm	16.7	−31%	10.3	8,909 t	€168k	€0
MATRAH	9405849	Chemical tanker	11.4 g CO₂/t·nm	16.7	−32%	11.9	10,391 t	€188k	€0
RAYSUT	9402225	Oil tanker	4.80 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−40%	10.8	10,949 t	€172k	€11k
SUR	9870824	Oil tanker	4.66 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−42%	11.4	20,581 t	€321k	€11k
BUKHA	9500936	Oil tanker	4.07 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−49%	12.3	5,691 t	€100k	€0
MAHADAH SILVER	9718777	Chemical tanker	7.86 g CO₂/t·nm	16.7	−53%	12.6	6,291 t	€110k	€0
MADHA SILVER	9718818	Chemical tanker	6.91 g CO₂/t·nm	16.7	−59%	12.0	2,232 t	€36k	€0
GULF LOYALTY	9441245	Oil tanker	2.88 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−64%	10.8	4,058 t	€66k	€0
DHALKUT	9888601	Oil tanker	2.86 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−64%	11.8	3,878 t	€60k	€0
AS SUWAYQ	9500728	Oil tanker	2.77 g CO₂/t·nm	8.06	−66%	11.2	14,179 t	€239k	€0

30 of 18 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.