Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Nordic Hamburgyour view
Nordic Hamburg
3 ISM companies in this group, 2024. Untick a company to leave it out of the figures.
- NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD8 ships · same name
- Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG6 ships · same name
- NORDIC HAMBURG 3 Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG1 ship · same name
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Nordic Hamburg | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 15 |
| CO₂ emitted | 143 kt |
| Fuel kg/nm | 86 |
| Average speed | 12.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 6 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Nordic Hamburg29.8 (+70% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin container | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs container medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic Hamburg | 10 | 29.8 | +70% | 87 | 12.8 | 3,821 | 7.2% | 6 / 0 |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Nordic Hamburg7.8 (−4% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin bulk carrier | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs bulk carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic Hamburg | 5 | 7.8 | −4% | 72 | 10.9 | 1,623 | 6.3% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
Nordic Hamburg: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORDIC HAMBURG | 9514755 | Container | 49.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +180% | 11.9 | 10,880 t | €218k | €8k |
| BG ORANGE | 9964637 | Container | 37.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +113% | 11.2 | 3,840 t | €100k | €42k |
| BG GREEN | 9964613 | Container | 36.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +110% | 13.0 | 14,285 t | €288k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS ARCTICLNG | 9818400 | Container | 31.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +78% | 12.7 | 13,263 t | €287k | €0 |
| BG BLUE | 9964625 | Container | 30.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +74% | 13.4 | 10,904 t | €313k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS NORDLNG | 9813993 | Container | 29.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +66% | 12.6 | 13,982 t | €283k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS AURORALNG | 9814014 | Container | 28.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +62% | 12.9 | 13,965 t | €299k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS POLARLNG | 9814002 | Container | 27.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +56% | 12.6 | 12,698 t | €248k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS STELLARLNG | 9866251 | Container | 24.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +39% | 13.3 | 16,587 t | €395k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS BOREALISLNG | 9866249 | Container | 23.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +31% | 13.0 | 15,517 t | €359k | €0 |
| PATAGONIA | 9611280 | Bulk carrier | 9.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +16% | 11.0 | 4,688 t | €87k | €0 |
| NORDIC WECO | 9607459 | Bulk carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −1% | 11.7 | 4,006 t | €65k | €0 |
| AQUITANIA | 9611278 | Bulk carrier | 7.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −7% | 10.2 | 4,847 t | €78k | €0 |
| ALENTEJO | 9626118 | Bulk carrier | 7.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −10% | 10.9 | 2,479 t | €41k | €0 |
30 of 15 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.