Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Nordic Hamburgyour view
Nordic Hamburg
2 ISM companies in this group, 2025. Untick a company to leave it out of the figures.
- Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG10 ships · same name
- NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD3 ships · same name
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Nordic Hamburg | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 13 |
| CO₂ emitted | 137 kt−4.0% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 86 |
| Average speed | 12.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 6 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Nordic Hamburg29.0 (+78% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin container | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs container medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic Hamburg | 9 | 29.0 | +78% | 88 | 12.5 | 4,224 | 7.9% | 6 / 0 |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Nordic Hamburg9.3 (+17% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin bulk carrier | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs bulk carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic Hamburg | 4 | 9.3 | +17% | 72 | 10.4 | 1,698 | 4.2% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic Hamburg | DNV (13) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nordic Hamburg: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATAGONIA | 9611280 | Bulk carrier | 25.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +222% | 10.3 | 1,087 t | €0 | €0 |
| BG ORANGE | 9964637 | Container | 36.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +125% | 12.1 | 10,178 t | €387k | €0 |
| BG GREEN | 9964613 | Container | 35.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +117% | 11.6 | 10,346 t | €421k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS NORDLNG | 9813993 | Container | 30.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +89% | 12.2 | 13,987 t | €544k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS STELLARLNG | 9866251 | Container | 29.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +81% | 12.5 | 15,072 t | €683k | €0 |
| BG BLUE | 9964625 | Container | 29.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +78% | 12.1 | 13,358 t | €671k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS POLARLNG | 9814002 | Container | 26.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +63% | 12.1 | 12,252 t | €376k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS ARCTICLNG | 9818400 | Container | 22.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +40% | 13.0 | 13,552 t | €404k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS BOREALISLNG | 9866249 | Container | 22.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +36% | 13.1 | 17,251 t | €505k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS AURORALNG | 9814014 | Container | 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +27% | 13.0 | 14,960 t | €450k | €0 |
| NORDIC DALIAN | 9667588 | Bulk carrier | 9.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +23% | 10.5 | 5,025 t | €147k | €4k |
| ALENTEJO | 9626118 | Bulk carrier | 8.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | +11% | 10.2 | 8,265 t | €26k | €0 |
| DALARNA | 9626120 | Bulk carrier | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.9 | −3% | 11.5 | 1,661 t | €0 | €0 |
30 of 13 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.