Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- General National Maritime Transport Companyyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| General National Maritime Transport Company | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 13 |
| CO₂ emitted | 133,264 t+27.1% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 134 |
| Average speed | 9.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 9.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.95
- General National Maritime Transport Company8.86 (+11% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin oil tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs oil tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General National Maritime Transport Company | 12 | 8.86 | +11% | 136 | 9.5 | 2,643 | 9.1% | – |
| Segment median | 7.95 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- General National Maritime Transport Company8.98 (−40% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin chemical tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs chemical tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General National Maritime Transport Company | 1 | 8.98 | −40% | 90.0 | 11.6 | 1,332 | 6.4% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General National Maritime Transport Company | Lloyd's Register (13) | 92% | 46% | 0% | 0% |
General National Maritime Transport Company: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANWAAR AFRIQYA | 9275268 | Oil tanker | 34.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +333% | 3.7 | 1,555 t | €43k | €9k |
| ANWAAR AL KHALIJ | 9313424 | Oil tanker | 26.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +230% | 7.5 | 3,401 t | €94k | €0 |
| ANWAAR AL NASER | 9313450 | Oil tanker | 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +184% | 7.2 | 6,296 t | €177k | €0 |
| GHAT | 9930105 | Oil tanker | 19.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +140% | 9.5 | 2,973 t | €82k | €0 |
| ALYARMOUK | 9356438 | Oil tanker | 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +35% | 8.9 | 24,255 t | €742k | €174k |
| EBN HAWKEL | 9874507 | Oil tanker | 9.60 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +21% | 10.4 | 20,903 t | €598k | €0 |
| AL AGAILA | 9415404 | Oil tanker | 8.12 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +2% | 7.3 | 7,644 t | €220k | €50k |
| FEZZAN | 9888730 | Oil tanker | 7.23 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −9% | 11.2 | 21,944 t | €642k | €0 |
| ANWAAR BENGHAZI | 9888742 | Oil tanker | 7.13 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −10% | 10.4 | 13,928 t | €415k | €49k |
| KUFRA | 9935155 | Oil tanker | 6.69 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −16% | 11.2 | 8,660 t | €241k | €0 |
| ALQADISIA | 9343352 | Oil tanker | 6.56 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −18% | 9.5 | 5,296 t | €189k | €57k |
| BARBAROSA | 9415399 | Oil tanker | 5.55 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −30% | 10.6 | 12,007 t | €378k | €65k |
| CARTAGENA | 9389318 | Chemical tanker | 8.98 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −40% | 11.6 | 4,401 t | €175k | €16k |
30 of 13 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.