Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD
Ships25
CO₂ emitted267 kt−23.7%
Fuel per mile160 kg/nm
Average speed11.9 kn
CO₂ at berth3.5%
Ships burning LNG2
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD8.0 (−51%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD68.0−51%26612.52,6992.3%–
Segment median 16.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD6.3 (−20%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD126.3−20%9010.71,0744.8%–
Segment median 7.90%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4

  • FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD37.7 (−32%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD237.7−32%7914.93,7192.0%2
Segment median 55.40%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD4.5 (−44%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD14.5−44%2829.12,2189.1%–
Segment median 8.00%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD16.2 (+8%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD216.2+8%7110.12,4319.6%–
Segment median 15.00%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD6.4 (−75%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD16.4−75%839.71,1709.7%–
Segment median 25.50%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTDClassNK (21), DNV (4)60%52%100%0%

FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
ORION OCEAN9738935Bulk carrier8.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+3%10.92,205 t€60k
EVER GOODS9810991Container7.3 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+3%13.874,427 t€2.1m
CL FUZHOU HE9890630Bulk carrier6.8 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+3%11.21,157 t€31k
NORD TAURUS9782182Bulk carrier6.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+1%11.44,126 t€87k
CL YICHUN9938793Bulk carrier8.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+1%11.02,958 t€80k
VENUS SKY9796951Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−1%10.82,343 t€68k
CEPHEUS OCEAN9686273Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−1%11.52,600 t€73k
COBALT NOVA9534028Oil tanker4.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−2%9.117,696 t€507k
CAPRICORN CONFIDENCE9878369Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−4%11.42,269 t€70k
MERCURY SKY9796949Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−5%9.02,931 t€84k
YM TRANQUILITY9792682Container9.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.3−9%13.67,041 t€187k
MAGENTA RAY9829722Chemical tanker19.1 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−10%9.74,904 t€175k
TEAL RAY9838668Chemical tanker13.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−13%10.56,166 t€208k
ALTAIR SKY9811555Bulk carrier6.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−13%9.22,136 t€65k
CL CHENZHOU9953339Bulk carrier5.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−14%11.62,595 t€78k
ONE INTELLIGENCE9933121Container6.1 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−15%10.423,480 t€390k
SUMMER SKY9790830Bulk carrier5.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−15%11.06,440 t€191k
YM TUTORIAL9792618Container11.9 g CO₂/t·nm14.4−17%14.115,810 t€417k
ONE TREASURE9773222Container8.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.3−19%11.237,320 t€1.0m
LAPIS ACELNG9991159Vehicle carrier42.6 g CO₂/t·nm55.4−23%14.917,837 t€522k
AMPHITRITE HIGHWAYLNG1024405Vehicle carrier32.7 g CO₂/t·nm43.7−25%14.96,789 t€191k
ONE MILANO9757187Container7.6 g CO₂/t·nm10.3−26%11.79,522 t€273k
UNITED GRACE9870147Bulk carrier2.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−42%10.07,127 t€192k
HOLLY ARROW9819985General cargo6.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−75%9.72,957 t€95k

30 of 25 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.