Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Thenamarisyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Thenamaris | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 98 |
| CO₂ emitted | 746 kt−7.8% |
| Fuel per mile | 139 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 5 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Thenamaris8.0 (+1% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thenamaris | 45 | 8.0 | +1% | 145 | 8.8 | 3,323 | 9.9% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- Thenamaris8.3 (+17% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thenamaris | 8 | 8.3 | +17% | 192 | 12.5 | 3,390 | 1.9% | 5 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Thenamaris13.6 (−9% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thenamaris | 11 | 13.6 | −9% | 97 | 10.7 | 1,802 | 10.3% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Thenamaris7.0 (−12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thenamaris | 26 | 7.0 | −12% | 86 | 10.6 | 1,525 | 4.1% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- Thenamaris44.8 (+26% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thenamaris | 6 | 44.8 | +26% | 87 | 13.2 | 1,674 | 1.6% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Thenamaris10.8 (−34% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thenamaris | 2 | 10.8 | −34% | 180 | 15.8 | 725 | 0.4% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thenamaris | RINA (98) | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% |
Thenamaris: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COOL ROVER | 9333618 | LNG carrier | 30.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +324% | 12.2 | 24,421 t | €1.1m |
| SEASALVIA | 9629550 | Chemical tanker | 19.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | +71% | 8.7 | 11,901 t | €345k |
| SEASTAR | 9373656 | Oil tanker | 16.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +60% | 10.1 | 8,422 t | €246k |
| SEAVALOUR | 9315771 | Oil tanker | 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +50% | 9.1 | 14,892 t | €593k |
| COOL RUNNERLNG | 9636797 | LNG carrier | 10.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +43% | 10.5 | 29,295 t | €812k |
| MATILDA | 9407457 | Oil tanker | 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +43% | 5.8 | 8,816 t | €281k |
| SEAEXPRESS | 9344019 | Oil tanker | 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +43% | 6.7 | 10,134 t | €381k |
| SEABLISS | 9587207 | Oil tanker | 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +42% | 5.4 | 15,356 t | €447k |
| SEAPRIDE | 9629562 | Chemical tanker | 20.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +35% | 8.9 | 5,680 t | €174k |
| SEATRIUMPH | 9783722 | Oil tanker | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +30% | 10.6 | 13,483 t | €388k |
| SEARAMBLER | 9892822 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 44.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | +26% | 12.2 | 4,763 t | €126k |
| SEAPASSION | 9783734 | Oil tanker | 5.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +26% | 10.3 | 18,151 t | €556k |
| SEAMUSIC | 9407445 | Oil tanker | 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +25% | 8.1 | 12,652 t | €366k |
| SEATRIBUTE | 9857468 | Oil tanker | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +22% | 8.9 | 21,142 t | €590k |
| SEAMAJESTY | 9601223 | Oil tanker | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +21% | 9.5 | 10,972 t | €310k |
| SEALEO | 9473066 | Oil tanker | 12.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +21% | 9.3 | 11,870 t | €370k |
| COOL EXPLORERLNG | 9640023 | LNG carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +20% | 14.9 | 5,168 t | €138k |
| SEAVISION | 9790971 | Oil tanker | 5.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +18% | 8.6 | 22,725 t | €632k |
| SEAVIGOUR | 9774185 | Oil tanker | 9.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +17% | 7.0 | 20,360 t | €663k |
| SEAVIOLET | 9790983 | Oil tanker | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +17% | 8.5 | 17,816 t | €540k |
| SEACHAMPION | 9936939 | Bulk carrier | 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +17% | 10.4 | 2,443 t | €94k |
| SEARANGER | 9759800 | Oil tanker | 9.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +16% | 11.0 | 14,671 t | €420k |
| SEARIDER | 9698953 | Bulk carrier | 9.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +15% | 12.2 | 4,094 t | €134k |
| SEAVICTORY | 9315783 | Chemical tanker | 17.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +14% | 10.0 | 4,135 t | €151k |
| COOL VOYAGERLNG | 9636785 | LNG carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +14% | 12.2 | 9,962 t | €266k |
| ST NICHOLAS | 9934149 | Chemical tanker | 12.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | +12% | 11.2 | 4,975 t | €140k |
| SEAGRACE | 9934826 | Oil tanker | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +10% | 8.1 | 16,566 t | €509k |
| SEASURFER | 9763033 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 22.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 20.9 | +9% | 13.9 | 7,131 t | €189k |
| SEALOYALTY | 9783928 | Oil tanker | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +8% | 8.9 | 18,238 t | €518k |
| SEAFRIEND | 9629574 | Chemical tanker | 16.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +8% | 10.0 | 8,228 t | €247k |
30 of 98 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.